AIPPI Sveriges rapporter

• Q 276-2021 Inventiveness and sufficiency of disclosure in AI inventions

• Q 277-2021 Registrability of trade marks against public order or morality

• Q 278-2021 Industrial designs and the role of prior art

• Q 279-2021 Reasonable awareness in compensation for infringement of IP rights

• Q 2019 IP damages for acts other than sales

• Q 2019 Plausibility

• Q 2019 Copyright in artificially generated works

• Q 2019 Consumer survey evidence

• Q 2017 Patentability of computer implemented inventions

• Q 2017 Protection of graphical user interfaces

• Q 2017 Quantification of monetary relief

• Q 2017 Bad faith trademarks

• Q 2016 Linking and making available on the internet

• Q 2016 Requirements for protection of designs

• Q 2016 Security interests over intellectual property

• Q 2016 The standard for determining adequate support for amendments

• Q 247, Trade secrets: overlap with restraint of trade, aspects of enforcement

• Q 246, Exceptions and limitations to copyright protection for libraries, archives and educational and research institutions

• Q 245, Taking unfair advantage of trademarks: parasitism 
  and free riding

• Q 244, Inventorship of multinational inventions

• Q 241, IP licensing and insolvency

• Q 240, Exhaustion issues in copyright law

• Q 239, The basic mark requirement under the Madrid System

• Q 238, Second medical use or indication claims

• Q 228, Patents on Prior User Rights

• Q 236, Relief in IP proceedings other than injunctions or damages

• Q 235, Term of copyright protection

• Q 234, Relevant public for determining the degree of recognition of famous marks, well-known marks and marks with reputation

• Q 233, Grace period for patents

• Q 232, The relevance of traditional knowledge to intellectual property law

• Q 231, The interplay between design and copyright protection for Industrial products

• Q 230, Infringement of trademarks by goods in transit

• Q 229, The use of prosecution history in post-grant patent proceedings

• Q 219 Injunctions on cases of infringement of IPRs

• Q 218 The requirement of genuine use of trademarks for maintaining protection

• Q 217 The patentability criteria for inventive step/non-obviousness

• Q 216B Exceptions to copyright protection and the permitted uses of copyrighted works in the hi-tech and digital sectors

• Q 216 Exceptions to copyright protection and the permitted uses of copyright works in the hi-tech and digital sectors

• Q 215 Protection of trade secrets through IP and unfair competition law

• Q 214 Protection against the dilution of a trade mark

• Q 213 The person skilled in the art in the context of the inventive step requirement in patent law

• Q 204P Liability for contributory infringement of IPRs - certain aspects of patent infringement

• Q 210, The protection of major sports events and associated commercial activities through Trade marks and other IPR

• Q 209, Selection inventions- the inventive step requirement, other patentability criteria and scope of protection

• Q 208, Border measures and other means of customs intervention against infringers

• Q 194, del 2, The impact of co-ownership of Intellectual Property Rights on their Exploitation

• Q 205, Exhaustion of IPRs in cases of recycling and repair of goods

• Q 204, The Liability for Contributory Infringement of IPRs

• Q 203, Damages for infringement, counterfeiting and piracy of trademarks

• Q 202, The impact of public health issues on exclusive patent rights

• Q 195, Limitations of the Trademark Protection

• Q 194, The impact of co–ownership of Intellectual Property Rights on their exploitation

• Q 193, Divisional, Continuation and Continuation in Part Applications

• Q 188, Conflicts between trademark protection and free speech

• Q 187, Limitations on exclusive IP Rights by competition law

• Q 186, Punitive damages as a contentious issue of Intellectual Property Rights

• Q 185, Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights

• Q 183, Employers’ rights to intellectual property

• Draft Q 178, Scope of patent protection

• Q 175, The role of equivalents and prosecution history in defining the scope of patent protection

• Q 174, Jurisdiction and applicable law in the case of cross-border infringement (infringing acts) of IP Rights

• Q 173, Issues of co-existence of trademarks and domain names

• Q 170, Secret Prior Art

• Q 169, Criminal law sanctions with regard to the infringement of IP Rights

• Q 168, Trademark

• Q 167, Current standards for prior art disclosures in assessing novelty and non-obiousness requirements

• Q 114 Biotechnology (including plant varieties) on the protection of inventions regarding isolated stem cells

• Q 109 Restitution of right of priority for PCT patent applications

• Special Committee Q 94, Survey based on Questionnaire no 4: Implementation of Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on TRIPs and Public Health

  Special Committee Q 94 Appendix